Dr. Stephen Narod and his team have armed us with invaluable information to help guide in our decision-making and to share with our doctors. Here are some of his research team's key findings to date:
Carriers of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations who have children are significantly more likely to develop breast cancer by age 40 than carriers who have not had any children. Each pregnancy is associated with an increased cancer risk. An early first pregnancy does not mean protection for carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations.
Women who have a BRCA1 mutation and breast-fed for a cumulative total of more than one year had a statistically significant reduced risk of breast cancer.
Oral-contraceptive use may reduce the risk of ovarian cancer in women with mutations in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene.
Among BRCA1 mutation carriers, women who first used oral contraceptives before 1975, who used them before age 30, or who used them for five or more years may have an increased risk of early-onset breast cancer. Oral contraceptives do not appear to be associated with risk of breast cancer in BRCA2 carriers, but data for BRCA2 carriers is limited.
The use of fertility medications does not adversely affect the risk of breast cancer among BRCA mutation carriers. However, the impact of fertility drug use among BRCA mutation carriers has not been studied closely due to the small number of carriers who have used fertility drugs. Any findings should be interpreted with caution. Further studies are required in this field.
Tubal ligation is a suitable option to reduce the risk of ovarian cancer in women with BRCA1 mutations who have completed childbearing.
The high incidence of ovarian cancer suggests that oophorectomy (surgical removal of the ovaries) should be recommended in female BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with a diagnosis of breast cancer, especially those with stage I disease. Breast cancer systemic therapy did not significantly alter the risk of ovarian cancer.
Oophorectomy is an effective means of reducing the risk of breast cancer in carriers of BRCA1 mutations. The data suggests oophorectomy is protective in BRCA2 carriers as well, but this needs to be confirmed in other studies. NOTE: A recent Dutch study has concluded very differently, based on their findings that the previous studies had design flaws. Follow-up studies of nearly 4,000 BRCA carriers showed that RRSO did reduce the risk of hereditary breast cancer in BRCA2 carriers, but not in BRCA1 carriers. Dr. Steven Narod, world-leader in the field of breast and ovarian cancer genetics, recently discussed this issue in a recentICARE publication and said the following: "Taken together, data suggest there is a benefit of RRSO to lower breast cancer risk among BRCA2 carriers, but not BRCA1 carriers."
Oophorectomy is associated with a reduced risk of ovarian and fallopian tube cancer in high-risk women, although there is a substantial residual risk for peritoneal cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers following prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy (a type of preventive surgery performed by removing the fallopian tubes and ovaries).
Tamoxifen, a drug used in the treatment of breast cancer, has been shown to reduce the risk of contralateral (affecting both breasts) breast cancer in women with mutations in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene. The protective effect of tamoxifen seems independent of that of removal of the ovaries. The protective effect of tamoxifen was not seen among women who had their ovaries removed but this subgroup was small. In contrast, a strong protective effect of tamoxifen was apparent among women who were premenopausal or who had undergone natural menopause.The risk of contralateral breast cancer in women with a BRCA mutation is approximately 40 per cent at 10 years after the first breast cancer diagnosis, and is reduced in women who take tamoxifen or who undergo an ovary-removal surgery.
We found no association between ever having screening mammography and risk of breast cancer. Prospective studies are needed to confirm the results.
Key Research Findings
Unfortunately, hereditary cancer is often painted with the same brush as spontaneous cancer. As new research is rolling in, we are learning more about how best to deal with hereditary cancer and the differences.